Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Beenleigh is an area with a long history of
endemic social issues (refer SEIFA Index
of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage).
Low income, low educational attainment,
high unemployment and people with low-skilled
occupations are the variables that reflect or
measure relative disadvantage. All these
factors contribute to influence how a community
copes with changing circumstances (ABS 2001b).

Although the factors which contribute to our area’s
social disadvantage may not be entirely the responsibility
of Gold Coast City Council (GCCC) the GCCC Corporate
Plan, 2005-2009 pledges commitment to Community

Capacity Building. I, personally, would like to know how
GCCC have, for instance, ‘worked in partnership with

the Beenleigh community to develop local support
networks
‘? (GCCC Corporate Plan, 2005-2009,
Strategic Priority 3.3.5).

Beenleigh is also a community crossed by lines.
Divided and on the fringe of each divisional boundary.
Socio-economic factors (and the lack of a coordinated
response by all levels of government to address them)
place us, as a community, in extremely marginalized
circumstance. Marginalised not only by our poorer
demographic (in relation to other parts of Gold Coast)
but also by our isolation factor in relation to ALL
of our boundaries.

Major barriers therefore exist for people in our area,
particularly the barrier of access to relative and appropriate
information. Our local paper, the Albert & Logan News,
has such a wide circulation, predominantly in Logan areas,
that Gold Coast City news receives limited coverage. There
are a
nomalies unique to Beenleigh residents, also, in
the dissemination of information from Qld State government.

When the Queensland government puts out its budget report,
telling us where the money is spent, residents of Beenleigh
receive information for Gold Coast Hospital, TAFE, University,
police etc despite the fact that we do not use these institutions.
W
e access tertiary education at Logan TAFE and Griffith
University in Logan because of closer proximity. We use Logan
Hospital and our police and ambulance response is coordinated
from Logan. W
e should, therefore, receive information about
Logan Hospital, TAFE, University, police, etc.

Studies confirm social isolation is the most significant factor
contributing to the onset of depression, particularly for people
with disabilities and the frail aged. So it may not be surprising
that my greatest criticism of Gold Coast City Council (GCCC)
is their neglect in providing adequate footpaths in the long-term
established areas of Beenleigh and surrounds. It is a disgrace
that so many people with mobility problems, and there are many
of these people in Beenleigh and surrounds because we have
a high level of public housing, are virtual prisoners in their own
homes because there are no footpaths in most suburban streets.

I, personally, have seen footpaths in newer areas all over
the southern Gold Coast. If there is any prioritising by GCCC
on a needs basis then Beenleigh and districts have certainly
been neglected. All the money that has been spent on massive
road re-constructions such as Harburg Dve (which is a total
overkill at the present rate of development) could have provided
many footpaths all over the district. Community Renewal has
funded some work on footpaths but it is only in highly visible
local routes. As we are experiencing an unprecedented growth,
the lack of footpaths also causes safety issues. People pushing
prams and people in motorized wheel chairs must currently use
the roads, which are now becoming heavy with traffic.

Another area of neglect is the fact that our roads, particularly
in less visible areas such as Bethania and Eagleby, have not
been maintained to a standard consistent with most parts
of southern Gold Coast. People here have told me ’GCCC

think slap-dash patching-up is good enough for Beenleigh…
after all nobody important ever sees them’.
However, all
the many bumps and potholes on much-traversed roads (such
as Riverhills Road in Eagleby) are safety hazards and contribute
to premature wear and tear on our older model cars.

Every afternoon around 3pm our traffic is in gridlock in various
parts of town. This situation is directly caused, I think, by a lack
of vision and planning by GCCC for our current growth.
Considering that GCCC approve every development that happens
in our area this situation is reprehensible. Our GCCC Division 1
Councillor tells us constantly in the media that the Beenleigh Ring
Road extension is vital to sorting out traffic problems in Beenleigh.
Many residents in the area would dispute his notion, in fact 12,000
people have signed a petition to stop this road.

This Ring Road was planned over twenty years ago
and patterns of road use have changed dramatically
since that time. If there has been a recent GCCC traffic study

in our area it has not been publicised. Instead of consulting
the wider community, our Councillor seems to make decisions
which affect traffic in Beenleigh based on the opinions of a ‘couple
of Beenleigh-Yatala Chamber of Commerce’ members (see Albert
& Logan News, Beenleigh edition, Wednesday, May 16th, page 8,
Letter to the Editor, ‘Creating Parking Confusion’).

Additionally, increased traffic over the past ten years has caused
many ‘hot spots’ and despite verbage within their Corporate Plan
(see Strategic Priority 2: Advocacy – ‘….Advancing the interests

of the city, through proactive representation and effective working
relationships, in particular with State and Federal governments’)
GCCC
do not seem to have effective processes established for
negotiation and cooperation with Queensland Main Roads to
rectify these dangerous traffic problems.

Where a council road and a main road intersect, each authority
shirks their responsibility to resolve the problem leaving residents
at risk. Examples of these ‘hot spots' include:

  • Kokoda Street and Milne Street - a much used local route
  • to Beenleigh town centre for people in Mt Warren Park
and the scene of many accidents over the years

· Tallegandra Road and Beenleigh-Beaudesert Rd – GCCC

have created a traffic problem at this intersection by completing

a massive up-grade of Harburg Dve allowing through traffic

from Logan access to the M1.

We must put up with dangerous situations for many years, like

the lack of traffic lights at Distillery Rd and Fryar Rd, until they

are termed ‘hot spots’ and receive Federal government funding.

However, the strongest case I think against Beenleigh remaining

in Gold Coast is the fact that our rates will inevitably increase.

According to FiscalStar (the peak body which assesses councils,

nationally, for their fiscal sustainability), GCCC’s ‘existing financial

policies are not sustainable, with disruptive increases in rates &

charges and/or cutbacks in services likely going forward as imbalances

evident in its financial performance and position are tackled’.

FiscalStar has assigned GCCC a one-star financial sustainability

rating on account of its unsustainable operating deficit. Logan City

Council which operates with a considerably smaller rate pool was

assigned a two star rating in the same study.

Logan City Council (LCC) takes a responsibility for providing human

service infrastructure and support to assist people with a diverse

range of social problems. GCCC pays lip service to ‘helping’ the

community, but provides very little assistance to community groups

here in Beenleigh. We have a decrepit Neighbourhood Centre,

white ant ridden and depressing. This building is sited in a

ridiculously inaccessible part of town and has no parking spaces

available for visitors to the Centre.

LCC has numerous Community and Neighbourhood Centres

together with other premises rented by community groups at

‘peppercorn’ rents. The availability of these community houses

allows many human service agencies to provide low cost

programs to help people experiencing family relationship problems,

domestic violence, child abuse, depression and other more serious

mental health problems. A distinct lack of similar council buildings

in Beenleigh, particularly over the past ten years has inhibited

the growth and development of numerous community groups

endeavoring to address these problems.

In conclusion, I reiterate these points for your consideration :

  • Beenleigh’s continuing level of relative social

disadvantage is unacceptable, particularly in the current

environment of rapid economic development in our area

  • Beenleigh needs a local government that will pay more

than ‘lip service’ to strengthening our communities capacity

to take ownership of the social problems in our area

and work towards change

  • GCCC’s unsustainable operating deficit and the inevitability

of rate increases or decrease in services would have

more impact on Beenleigh residents than residents from

less disadvantaged socio-economic areas of southern Gold Coast

  • Regardless of our local area boundary, we are intrinsically

linked with Logan due to the fact that we use Logan-based

institutions, trades and services

  • GCCC have failed to plan proactively for the rapid

development which has occurred in Beenleigh

over the past ten years

  • Our footpaths, roads and community buildings are below

par and highly visible examples of this neglect.

Beenleigh’s position needs to be strengthened by any amalgamation.

We can hardly be a Qld State Development classified Major Economic

Centre if our community development does not keep abreast

of our economic development.

Thank you for offering me an opportunity to vent…

Thursday, May 17, 2007

Beenleigh - are we really better off in Gold Coast?

hi there folks...have been a little busy lately with one thing
or another but wednesday's albert & logan news has
inspired me to write....i used to write letters to the editor
but don't like to see them edited...lol...so i love the blog!!

ok...what is it that has raised my hackles this time?..
propoganda....and bees wax...
front page story in large print...'coast yes, logan no'
businesses in beenleigh aparantly have 'overwhelmingly'
endorsed staying in gold coast city...then you read on
only to discover that they surveyed only 25 percent
of beenleigh yatala chamber of commerce members
and 70 per cent (of the 25%) want to keep the same
boundaries....

now come on....overwhelmingly?....hardly....i have
studied 'survey design' at university....and i have some
questions to ask....did all chamber members get
the opportunity to participate in the survey?...i have
been told that a few may have been overlooked...
so the survey falls down right there....if that is the case
it is more like a manipulated response than a survey...

just so you don't think i am jumping to conclusions...
turn your wednesday albert & logan to page 8
and read david phillips' letter to the editor...
david takes exception to the fact that our local
councillor apparently asked a 'couple' of people
in the chamber before changing the parking in
george street to 'nose in'...

my objection is....decisions are often made about
beenleigh that affect everyone here and we are
not adequately consulted and often not even
informed prior to the change occurring...
reminds me a little of joh's... 'don't you worry
about that now'....

for instance....has anyone been told about
the revitalise beenleigh project ??
found this info on gccc website...

Gold Coast City Council, through the Economic
Development and Major Projects Directorate,
coordinates a signature geographic industry
development program titled the 'Pacific
Innovation Corridor' project. A key centre
identified for economic enhancement within
this project is the Beenleigh Town Centre,
which is recognised as one of the oldest original
communities within the Gold Coast and
a centre experiencing rapid growth.

An important project that was identified
by Beenleigh Town Centre stakeholders
and the Council for this precinct is the
'Revitalise Beenleigh' project, which will
commence this month and will be managed
with consultants The Hornery Institute.

Revitalise Beenleigh contains four
components, which together will combine
to enhance and direct sustainable economic
growth within the Beenleigh Town Centre,
these include:

1. Beenleigh Town Centre Visioning -
which will develop in consultation with town
centre business stakeholders, a high level
vision and design for a future Beenleigh,
which will be incorporated into the Council’s
Local Growth Management Strategy

2. Invest In Beenleigh – undertaking a Town
Centre property and business audit to identify
business gaps and available sites for future
development and the creation of an investment
attraction campaign to stimulate investment
and provide developers, investors and current
business operators with a future vision, data
and promotional material to embrace
and develop Beenleigh

3. Town Centre Business Development Program -
identifying, developing and delivering a tailored
business-training program

4. Engaging Beenleigh Youth - engaging youth
in these revitalisation components and developing
a project that will enable them to take ownership
over the developing Beenleigh Town Centre

The Revitalise Beenleigh project will be coordinated
and delivered over the next 12-months and there
will be opportunities for involvement by businesses
and the community.


Revitalise Beenleigh is supported by funding from
the Australian Government under its Regional
Partnerships programme, in conjunction with
Council, the State Government and Beenleigh
Yatala Chamber of Commerce.

So that is very promising...it says there will be
opportunities for involvement by community...
if only the community would get involved...
come on beenleighites....change your lives...
get involved in the decision making process
that will affect the way you live....put up all
your good ideas that you bore the family
talking about...magic comes from action...

well back to my discussion (with myself)...lol..
(my children tell me they read every word
i write...yeh sure...)....are we better off
sticking to the old horse....gold coast?

before you start on about losing the prestige
of our address....get a grip....this is beenleigh...
it doesn't matter one iota that we are part
of gold coast because no-one else realises
this....be honest... don't your friends from
other places... (like my friends) say to
you...."are you sure you live in gold coast"...
and don't you answer (like i do)...."well that's
the council that i pay my rates to"....

it is total snobbery in my opinion to say that
logan is of a lower social standard than beenleigh...
maybe....a while back....before community
renewal spending had changed the physical
face of logan....and way before the current
logan city council (which incidentally takes
a responsibility for providing human service
infrastructure to assist people with a variety
of social problems)....

there are very few services in beenleigh
or surrounding districts....we have that decrepit
neighbourhood centre hidden up mansfield walk
....no parking for visitors....white ant ridden and
depressing....go over to logan and visit some of
the many community centres in their district...
see how many programs that are running to
help people with family relationship problems,
domestic violence, child abuse, depression and
other more serious mental health problems...

where do people in beenleigh go for this sort of help?
...to logan...we also go to logan hospital, logan tafe,
logan griffith...the trades and services we use
come from logan....not gold coast....

when the state government puts out it's budget
report telling us where the money is to be spent...
they always put the gold coast hospital, tafe,
university expenditure on the one they post to
us in beenleigh...i have informed them we should
be getting the logan one as we do not use the gold
coast institutions....they still persist in sending us
information about gold coast....

but perhaps the most important point for wanting
to merge with logan is money....sure our rates
are cheaper at the moment but the gold coast city
council got a lower assessment than logan in a national
fiscal assessment of councils...i will now paste this
information...or check it out yourself on
http://fiscalstar.com.au/content/category/17/72/
note the bit where it says our rates are going up!!!
cheers for now....elle

The Council (gold coast) is assigned a one-star
financial sustainability rating on account
of its unsustainable operating deficit.
We estimate it has an underlying
operating deficit in excess of 30% of
revenue from rates & charges.

The deficit is being funded mainly by
borrowing, with the Council’s debt at 71%
of its annual operating revenues.
However, to date, any associated
deferral of asset renewal expenditure has
not been significant, with the average
remaining age of the Council’s assets still
almost 70%.

Despite its below-average
underlying growth in spending on
services, the Council has insufficient
capacity to address its financial
imbalances without also putting
substantial upward pressure on future
rates & charges.

Our assessment therefore is that the
Council’s existing financial policies are
not sustainable, with disruptive increases
in rates & charges and/or cutbacks in
services likely going forward as
imbalances evident in its financial
performance and position are tackled.

now what do you think???